**“Vortex Gravitation” Model — “Gaseous Aether” — Gradient Gravitation Field**

Now, let us return to the “Gravitation Vortex” Model as described in the book series: Super Principia Mathematica – The Rage to Master Conceptual and Mathematical Physics

Earlier in the post I discussed that the “Aether” is another term for the “Vacuum Energy” that permeates all of the “Free Space” or “Space-time” of the “Universe.” The Aether is also described as a real gas that behaves like an ideal gas. The constituents of the “Aether Gas” are the “Aetherons.” And therefore the “Aetherons” are also the constituents of “Space” or “Space-time.”

1) the “Aetherons” exist only pairs. And there is no such thing as a single Aetheron. An Aetheron is an elastic spherical volume of space known as the Q-Sphere, that consists of and Outer Shell Exterior Aetheron, and an Interior to the spherical volume Aetheron; that is in random motion within the interior with an average speed equal to the speed of light. Energy is exchanged when the Interior Aetheron collides with the inner wall of the Exterior Aetheron.

2) The “Aetherons” are not particles nor are they waves, but the “Aetherons” exists in elastic spherical volumes where the radius of the volume is directly proportional to the mass. This also means that the larger the volume of space the more “Aether” or “Aetherons” occupy that volume of space.

3) The larger the liner (radial) “space” or volume “space” the larger the quantity of Aether and the greater the number of Aetherons in that ‘space.” And the larger the Inertial Mass in that space.

4) Inertial Mass (i.e. electons, protons, atoms, planets, suns, galaxies) are modeled as the condensing of the Aetherons into radial, tangential, and orthogonal directions.

In Steven Rado’s “Aether” gas model he uses the term “Sink Vortex” to describe that Gravitation is the procress where the “Aether” is condensing into “mass/matter.” For a description of the mechanics of this “Sink Vortex” model for Gravitation, Rado combined the model of Johannes Kepler’s Third Law, Descartes “Circular Vortex Theory”, and Isaac Newton’s Gravitational Attraction Theory.

The Rado Aether Gas being modeled here is a real gas that behaves like an ideal gas. The “Aetherons” of the Rado Ideal Aether Gas that I am modeling here, are not exactly “particles” nor are they exactly “waves.” Truly the Aetherons are both particle and wave like. The Aetherons of the Aether Gas are not point particles but exist as a single volume of paired elastic units.

The Aetherons of the Aether Gas also interact only with they collide. The Vacuum Energy Aetherons are not particles per se, but that the vacuum is made of Aetherons which exhibit particle and wave type behavior.

I do not think that we can measure a single or a pair of Aetherons. What we can measure is the effect of the motion of the aetherons on matter(mass). The Aetherons in a vortex flow are readily seen and measured as the magnetic field. And the Aetherons in a vortex flow are not seen and not so easy to measure as the gravitational field.

-The Aetherons always come in pairs. This Aetheron pairing could be responsible for the elastic wave behavior?

-The Q-Sphere Aetheron and the interior Aetheron can change places or states

-The Aetherons of the Aether Gas interact only with they collide

-There is an enormous amount of Aetherons that make up a proton, electron, or photon. And yes the electron aetherons do interact in an interlocking way with the protons!

For any Net Inertial Mass body some Aetherons of the vortex that make up that mass body are Isotropic (direction independent and random) and some Aethrons are anisotropic (direction dependent)

I don’t have time to go into the history, but briefley, Rene Descartes proposed a “Circular Aether Vortex Theory’ for Graviatation. Isaac Newton rejected the “Circular Aether Vortex Theory” for Gravitation because Johannes Kepler’s three (3) laws of motion predict “elliptical motion” for gravitation and not “circular motion.” Steven Rado ca.1994 in his book AETHRO-KINEMATICS, returned to the “Aether Vortex” theory agreeing with Newton that Kepler was correct and modified the “Circular Vortex Theory” into a “Spiral Sink Vortex Theory;” and thereby resurrecting Descartes Vortex by applying Kepler laws to a vortex that predicts elliptical motion and not circular motion, returned to the “Aether Vortex” theory agreeing with Newton that Kepler was correct and modified the “Circular Vortex Theory” into a “Spiral Sink Vortex Theory;” and thereby resurrecting Descartes Vortex by applying Kepler laws to a vortex that predicts elliptical motion and not circular motion.

Taking these concepts further in the Super Principia Mathematica, I model a Gaseous Gradient Gravity Field using a new term that I coined **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** denoted by the symbol ( )

This term the **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** () is used as a term that describes the general motion in a gradient gravitational field; which is equilavent to a “Non-Inertial Frame” of reference.

1) This term the **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** () describes a specific quantity of the Gravitational Attraction that is directly proportional to the mass. Therefore each mass body has its own **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** (); or vortex.

2) This term the **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** () encapulates the following quantities into one term (Net Inertial Mass, Tangential Velocity, Gravitational Acceleration, Aerial Velocity, Angular Velocity, Angular Acceleration, Vorticity, Volume, Space (Distance), and Time).

3) This term the **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** () describes a Gravitational Gradient Field, that is made up of concentric spherical volumes of space that extend from some smallest distance or volume in the field out to and infinite distance in the gravity field. The smallest curvature, volume, radius of the gradient field is described by the Schwarzschild Radius (); and from the Schwarzschild radius we can get the volume () and spacetime curvature ().

Let me give you a little more detail about the **“Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate”** () is a vector that points in the same direction as the Gravitational Force () and the Gravitational Acceleration () towards the center of the an Inertial mass body.

**Inertial Net Mass = Gravitational Inertial Mass**

**The Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate – (Vector)**

**The Inertial Gravitation Evolutionary Attraction Rate – (Scalar)**

**(Mass & Energy) = (Minimum Space-time Field Gradient) = (Maximum Space-time Field Gradient)**

Now the above general * gradient gravity field* equation is similar to the Einstein Field Equation in that you have “Matter and Energy” on the left hand side of the equation and “Space and Time” on the right hand side of the equation. This means that anywhere you localize space and time into a specific volume you also have mass and energy in that volume.

The above Inertial Gravitation Evolutional Attraction Rate predicts that the larger the volume or the radius of the gradient gravity field the slower the rotation of mass as well as the aetherons in the gravity field.

The Einstein Field Equation below also has “Matter and Energy” on the left hand side of the equation and “Space and Time” on the right hand side of the equation.

**The Inertial Gravitation Evolutiionary Attraction Rate – (Scalar)**

**Newtonian Gravitational Force Law:**

************************************************************

**Citation**

Cite this article as:

Robert Louis Kemp; The Super Principia Mathematica – The Rage to Master Conceptual & Mathematical Physics – The General Theory of Relativity – “**“ Vortex Gravitation” Model — “Gaseous Aether” — Gradient Gravitation Field**

**”**

**– Online Volume – ISBN 978-0-9841518-2-0, Volume 3; July 2010**************************************************************

Author: Robert Louis Kemp

Very interesting information!Perfect just what I was searching for!

I like this blog very much so much wonderful information.

Thank you for another excellent post. Where else could anybody get that kind of info in such an ideal way of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I’m on the look for such info.